Terrorists kill Jimmy Tag Along - Excerpt, The Devil's Darning Needle

A counterterrorism thriller by Ben R. Furman

The entrance to the Roosevelt Roads Navy Base was less than three blocks away and for the military and civilian personnel working there, the station was a convenient stopping place. El Gordo couldn’t afford to have his Coke machine out of commission long, so it was always quickly repaired. In about a week it would be ready for salting again. Easy money.

Johnny took a bag of rock salt from Frank, who had carried it from home and complained all the way. “You do the heavy lifting because you’re stronger. Quit complaining. I, Johnny el Grande, do all the hard work. Grab the sprayer I hid behind the big bush.”

Johnny screwed off the top, poured several handfuls of salt into the sprayer and carried it into the women’s bathroom. He turned on the hot water tap and waited. When the brackish water faded to tan, he filled the sprayer and stirred it. Satisfied, he screwed the plunger back in and pumped the air pressure as high as he could.

Jimmy signaled El Gordo was still under the pickup. Johnny stuck the sprayer nozzle into every opening, pumped the witch’s brew deep inside, and in short minutes the sick machine threw up its treasure. Johnny grinned and did his victory dance.

Frank scooped up the last of the coins and Johnny signaled Jimmy that it was time to go. The high pitched squeal of a cargo van’s tires ripped the air when it missed the turn at the intersection. It jumped the curb, smashed into the pumps, and spewed a fountain of gas in every direction. Five men in army fatigues with guns jumped from the back. El Gordo ran out of the service bay yelling and waving his lunch bucalaito menacingly in their direction. He was killed with one shot. Frank felt and heard the slap of a bullet as it passed his right ear. A meek groan came from behind. He turned. Jimmy had been shot in the head and crumpled slowly to the ground.

A second van screeched to a stop and the men leaped inside. Frank stood frozen, and then he saw the shooter who was only a few years older than he, pointing a rifle at his chest. In a rush of rage and defiance, Frank spit in his direction.

The barrel rose slowly and the teen, who had so calmly killed El Gordo and Jimmy, gave him a nod of acknowledgement and said, “You’ve got guts cabrito.” Then he pulled a lighted cigarette from his lips and motioned toward the woods behind the station. Frank ran toward the path with Johnny on his heels.

The driver of the van shouted, “Damn it, Ojeda, come on.”

As the van sped away, Frank took a quick glance as the flipped cigarette touched the widening pool of gasoline.

action adventure action books adult counterterrorism books adult fiction thriller adult novels adventure series counterterrorism books counterterrorism stories fiction thriller independent publishing publisher suspense thrillers

The Devil’s Darning Needle -- Excerpt

The Obrero Gang

By Ben Furman

The Obrero Gang was Frank Durazo, Johnny Salinas and Jimmy Tag Along. The ten year olds had grown up on a nameless, carved-out street in Barrio Obrero on the outskirts of San Juan, and throughout the barrio it was well known that when one was sighted the other two would be right behind. It was time to hide the valuables.

Frank was the biggest and fastest, and he could more than hold his own with the older kids. He possessed the hand-eye coordination of a shell-game operator, and in moments of fancy, thought his athletic ability would be his ticket out of poverty. Perhaps a baseball scholarship. His grades could be better. He was bright enough, but he realized that he wasn’t the gifted student who could breeze through school effortlessly. But he was dogged in anything he decided to do, and through will and determination he got by.

Jimmy Tag Along’s mother had explained to them that Jimmy would always remain a “little boy.” They didn’t understand what she meant, but it really didn’t matter. In a sacred ceremony the boys had sealed their friendship by cutting their thumbs with a pocket knife and smashing their thumbs together. “Now we’re blood brothers,” Johnny said. They vowed to take care of each other come what may.

It was sweltering and nearing noon as the gang stepped from the wooded path that ended at El Gordo’s gas station. Their target was the soft drink machine that was pushed tightly against the side of the building next to the bathrooms. El Gordo was the only employee and whenever he was working on a car or eating, which was often, they would hit the machine. They found him wedged under an old pickup with a bucalaito in one hand and a wrench in the other. Good. It would take only a few minutes for them to score.

As they moved in the pent-up heat in the blacktop burned through the soles of their sandals, and each hopped from one foot to the other to reach the shade of the building.

Johnny liked the heat. As he told Frank too often, “It’s good for business. The hotter the more people drink, and that means more money in our pockets. Easy money!”

action adventure action books adult counterterrorism books adult fiction thriller adult novels adventure series counterterrorism books counterterrorism stories fiction thriller independent publishing news publisher reviews suspense thrillers

Terrorist Alert: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.

By Jamie Glazov
FrontPageMagazine.com | 4/3/2009

FrontPage Interview’s guest today is Ben R. Furman, the FBI's Former Counterterrorism Chief. He writes a blog at blackhawkpress.com/blog, and he is the author of The Devil’s Darning Needle, a counterterrorism thriller.

FP: Ben R. Furman, welcome to Frontpage Interview.

I’d like to talk to you today about unmanned aerial vehicles and what they mean to the terror war.

How do we start this discussion?

Furman: Jane’s, a military weapons systems authority, just published the specifics and details of over 180 operational unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and also reported that more than forty countries are developing and/or deploying UAV systems.

As an example, on March 20, 2008, Pakistan’s Chief of Army, Staff General Ashfaq Kayani, displayed a Pakistani-made UAV that successfully completed flight trials and is ready for production. Unmanned combat and intelligence systems are a major thrust for us as shown by the 2008 billion dollars plus Department of Defense budget dedicated to developing and acquiring micro aerial vehicles (MAVs) and UAVs.

I became aware of the micro unmanned robot world and its attractiveness to terrorists during research for my counterterrorism novel, The Devil’s Darning Needle. I took literary license and slightly advanced the capabilities of a prototype dragonfly robotic MAV I discovered and used it as my attack delivery system. Their small size and carbon fiber skins echoed as birds on radar monitors, and their lethal potential for dispensing explosives or deadly chemical/biological agents made them the perfect weapon.

Too Sci-Fi? Here’s a taste of the newest technology. In the micro vehicle area the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), responsible for the development of new technology for use by the military, is evaluating the MicroSTAR, a low flying MAV that weighs 85 grams and measures 15 centimeters across. It’s capable of carrying an infra-red or visible light camera for surveillance, or biological/chemical “sniffers” and it provides real-time actionable intelligence. An autopilot and inertial navigation is integrated into the system, and the tiny bot flies at 30 mph for up to 20 minute missions. It’s designed to be launched at the platoon level, or released from over-flying planes.

FP: So can terrorists get their hands on these easily?

Furman: From a practical standpoint, acquiring these highly sophisticated, tightly held, ultra expensive UAVs or MAVs is out of the question. So what’s a poor jihadist to do? Well, it’s easy and inexpensive to build or buy a functioning, improvised UAV.


Let’s see what can be accomplished on “the cheap.” What can a terrorist buy for $9.95?


-- A “Happy Meal” with fries and a diet Coke, or the plans for a miniature remote controlled, tank-tracked ground platform.


-- What can he buy for $19.95? A set of Ginzu knives with a potato peeler thrown in comes to mind, or how about the plans for building a miniature version of the Predator?


-- If he’s tech challenged, can’t change a light switch, but flushed with money, a flight-ready model of the Predator can be bought for $199.95 from a hobby shop that’s easy to modify for sinister purposes.


-- Comparison shopping: The real one costs about $3.5 million per copy, not including the ground control systems.


Today, remote controlled aircraft, radio transmission systems, camera phones, GPS, Google Earth, Google Maps, computer programmable navigational systems and technologies are readily available on the Internet, in toy stores (Lego’s programmable lift platform, for example), and on the shelves of hobby shops.


Cobble everything together and a terrorist would be hard pressed to spend more than $3,000 for a robotic plane with a six-foot wing span that cruises at 45 mph for thirty minutes at 1,500 feet, and carries a fifteen pound payload. No, it’s not the equivalent of a Global Hawk or the Predator with Hellfire missiles, but it will fly and quite well.


Legitimate enthusiasts build their vehicles for the fun and challenge of it; terrorists build them to cause death and mayhem. And, they don’t have to smuggle anything into the country. Terrorists can legitimately buy what they need to build an improvised unmanned vehicle off the shelf and modify it to suit their purposes. Keep in mind that terrorists seek the world stage – they know the more horrific the act the more media coverage they can demand. And even a small attack, if properly focused, can produce a major psychological effect on the entire nation.


Imagine the reaction should a swarm of MAVs smash into the center of a packed sports stadium and explode or disperse a deadly toxin, or if a dozen remote controlled road-side IED drones were spun into the path of an Army truck convoy.


The concern about robotic micro vehicles and ICCDs surfaced during the 9/11 commission hearings and in various intelligence gathering committees as well. In February, 2004 former CIA Director George Tenet appeared before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and said this, “Many countries remain interested in developing or acquiring land-attack cruise missiles, which are almost always significantly more accurate than ballistic missiles and complicate missile defense systems. Unmanned aerial vehicles are also of growing concern."


FP: So what does the near future hold in terms of this terrifying reality?


Furman: While no terrorist incidents involving unmanned vehicles have yet been reported in the U.S., that doesn’t mean terrorist planners aren’t considering them as a means of delivery. They’ve surfaced elsewhere as the following examples show:

The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), an anti-government terrorist group, was discovered in possession of nine remote-controlled unmanned aircraft when a Colombian army unit overran one of their remote camps in August 2002. (Source: EFE News Service, August 28, 2002.)

The Vremya Novostei newspaper reported the plans for Israel’s newest developmental reconnaissance UAV model were stolen from a building plant in Israel. The UAV weighs 14 kg and has a wingspan of 1.5 m. There were fears about the possible use of the model by terrorists. (Source: Vremya Novostey, November 11, 2003.)

Hamas said six of their senior activists were killed in March, 2004 when an ICCD they had planned to launch against Israel blew up prematurely in central Gaza as it was being prepared for flight. Authorities surmised the ICCD drone was packed with explosives. (Source: Jane's Missiles and Rockets, December 1, 2004.)

On 04/20/05 the Defense Industry Daily reported: For the second time in five months, Hezbollah militants operating an Iranian-made drone, the Mirsad-1 UAV, penetrated Israel’s air defenses and flew unmolested for nearly nine minutes over Western Galilee cities and settlements before returning safely to southern Lebanon. The UAV was not initially picked up by Israel’s elaborate, overlapping sensor-fused early warning network.

According to the story, Israel’s current air defenses are not designed to detect and recognize small, low-flying, slow-moving objects like small UAVs. Their flight profiles on radar and even through electro-optical and other sensors, is obscured by ground clutter, glare and other environmental conditions. “It’s like catching a mosquito with a net,” said Brigadier General Ruth Yaron, Israel Defense Forces (IDF) chief spokeswoman.

International intelligence analysts have expressed concerns that future UAV incursions could be equipped with more deadly payloads like biological or chemical agents. The Mirsad-1 can carry 50 kilograms of explosives.

Tree top-hugging, radar-resistant improvised UAVs operating close to an intended target, perhaps line-of-sight close, are major problems. Our response contingency planning to address this kind of threat has to be “spot on.” There won’t be much time to react to improvised UAVs even if they’re only flying at 35 mph – 45 mph. The authority to act will be critical, and those manning the turrets must be the decision-makers. There won’t be time to run the situation up the chain-of-command and back.


FP: Aren’t we giving the terrorists ideas by talking about this?


Furman: Initially I wondered if talking openly about this danger was a good idea. Wouldn’t it be a “heads up” for terrorists? No. A thorough library check and Internet and blog searches revealed the technology wafted out of the genie’s bottle some time ago, and even with technology that advances in quantum leaps, someone is keeping pace and reporting or commenting about it real-time. Chat rooms, YouTube and FaceBook are heavily peppered with “how to” information about building and flying improvised UAVs and MAVs. If you have a question about building a bot, ask it and instantly a dozen answers appear on your computer screen.


Before my FBI partner and I entered dark and scary places he always reminded me to, “Put your head on a swivel like an owl.” He wanted me totally focused and aware of my surroundings; great advice that kept us safe. So, if you hear what sounds like an angry lawn mower flying overhead, you might want to check it out, or the spider that went off like a sparkler when you squashed it underfoot might be worth a closer look.


Let’s not forget: Security is everyone’s job, and as my partner wisely said, put your head on a swivel and always be mindful of your surroundings.


FP: Ben R. Furman, thank you for joining us.

TAGS: advice counterterrorism stories independent publishing news publisher reviews

FrontPage Magazine Interview of Ben R. Furman

FrontPage Interview’s guest today is Ben R. Furman, the FBI's Former Counterterrorism Chief. He writes a blog at blackhawkpress.com/blog, and he is the author of The Devil’s Darning Needle, a counterterrorism thriller.

FP: Welcome to the FrontPage interview, Mr. Furman.

We would like to talk to you today about the infiltration of terrorists across U.S. northern and southern borders, and the groups here that support it via facilitating illegal alien immigration.

What is the state of this problem as we speak?

BF: No one knows how many terrorists are currently in the United States, but that they are here is not debatable, and the tally goes up each day. It’s natural to be swept away by the frightening battle occurring along our southern border, and it’s easy to be overwhelmed by the flood of illegal aliens crossing over that are eluding capture, but there’s a similar problem on our northern border that can’t be overlooked and it is equally as serious.

Terrorist infiltration is a deadly ongoing problem that our counterterrorism and law enforcement agencies face, both externally and internally, and in many respects the internal obstacles are the most troubling. Rooting out terrorists is a difficult job under the best of circumstances, but it’s made more difficult by the “open border” crowd that labels the agencies or anyone trying to control illegal immigration as racists, xenophobes and bigots. And the current mantra of political correctness has darn near beaten common sense police work to death.

Let me give you an example. Ahmed Ressam, the Algerian who plotted to blow up the Los Angeles Airport on the eve of the millennium was arrested in Port Angeles as he drove off a ferry from British Columbia with a trunk full of bomb-making materials. The agent responsible for the arrest said it had little to do with the man’s nationality, rather that he was sweating (it was December and at the northern border), made no eye contact, became belligerent as she peppered him with questions, and he gave lousy answers. She followed her training and applied common sense to the situation. Would this same incident be considered racial profiling today? I suspect the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) would use it as another example of Muslims being targeted by racist jack-booted cops.

Fox News reported that in October 2008 the Border Patrol began conducting random roadside stops of buses that pick up passengers at the Port Angeles ferry terminal, across the strait from Victoria, BC, to check for illegal aliens. Michael Mermudez, the Border Patrol spokesman said, “These are the places that terrorists or criminals would use to egress away from the border.”

Again, the Border Patrol’s actions make sense to most of us, but not to the ACLU, which has joined forces with left-leaning groups in Washington State, who say these measures have infringed on people’s civil liberties. So what are they doing to thwart the efforts of the Border Patrol? They’re installing signs in all the buses informing riders of their rights to ignore Border Patrol agents.

The way I see it, the ACLU has just handed the terrorists a playbook for evading federal law enforcement agents who are working to secure one of the most dangerous and porous borders in the country at a time when the threat to national security is particularly high. And, let’s not forget, in 2010 the Winter Olympics will be held in Vancouver; terrorists love the world stage and visions of the 1972 Olympics come to mind.

From a topographical standpoint, our border with Canada stretches 4,000 miles through mostly unattended territory and twelve states, and the terrain, especially in the Pacific Northwest, makes detection difficult. The Puget Sound area, for example, is dotted with numerous small islands, lakes and heavy forests that provide cover for illegals, and the border security forces, both Canadian and U. S., are thin. We’re also challenged by Canada’s immigration and security policies. In particular, Canada doesn’t have a visa requirement for visitors from forty countries, and many are aliens of special interest (ASIC) that come from countries with known ties to terrorist groups or have a substantial terrorist presence within their borders.

Even more troubling is the inability of Canadian law enforcement to track those entering the country. For example, within 72 hours after arriving by an international flight, entry records are purged. This creates a security nightmare for us when one of these individuals arrives at a point of entry. There’s no way to corroborate the story about how or when the individual entered Canada and for what purpose.

During a question and answer session after a speech I’d given on terrorism, I was accused by a journalist of hyping the northern border terrorist problem; she said there was none. I wish it were so. In 2002, the director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) reported this to the Canadian Senate Committee on Security and Intelligence:

“With perhaps the singular exception of the United States, there are more international terrorist groups active here than any other country in the world.
“By way of example, the following terrorist groups or front groups acting on their behalf have been and are active in Canada: Hezbollah and other Shiite Islamic terrorist organizations; several Sunni Islamic extremist groups, including Hamas, with ties to Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Lebanon and Iran; the Tamil Tigers; the Kurdistan Worker's Party (PKK); and all of the world's major Sikh terrorist groups.”

And in its November 2008 report to Congress concerning northern border security, the Department of Homeland Security said, “The primary threat along the northern border is the potential for extremists and their conveyances to enter the U.S. undetected. There is an undisputed presence in Canada of known terrorist affiliate and extremist groups, including Hezbollah, Hamas and the Armed Islamic Group of Algeria."

The situation in the south is another ulcer maker. The deadly civil war between the drug cartels and Mexican soldiers has created an ideal climate for terrorists to slip into the country. Smugglers, both human sex trade traffickers, and those like the “coyotes” that transport illegal aliens, are eager to help them for a price.

A major concern is the terrorist who gains entry legally by establishing residence in a friendly country like Venezuela, becoming a citizen, and then entering the U.S. by a valid visa. With the increased scrutiny of visitors and the visa tracking enhancements being implemented, solid steps are being taken to control that migration segment, considerable work still has to be done to fill in all the intelligence gaps.

Operationally, I believe the stealth terrorist is the bigger danger. Less than half of the illegals who flood across our border are apprehended. This means no one can say how many terrorists or terrorist sympathizers are moving about the country unchecked, but they number in the tens of thousands. And it’s no secret that Middle East terrorists enter Central and South America and Mexico, change their Islamic names to Hispanic, match their new identities with forged documentation and like sucker fish; attach themselves to the flood of illegal aliens crossing our borders. Once here they swim silently away to the deep shadows.

We have to maximize the limited resources dedicated to fighting the terrorist threat. Our agencies are working hard to do so by employing unmanned aero vehicles (UAV), sensors, visa enhancement and control, border cameras, and many other viable avenues to compensate for the manpower shortage. Others are better equipped than I to address our feckless politicians and the radical Left terrorist facilitators that permeate our landscape and create dangerous problems. But here’s an issue that needs to be addressed by the Department of Justice and the politicians. There’s a trainload of frivolous, harassing lawsuits against agents alleging they’re the bad guys and the terrorists are the victims. There has to be a safety umbrella developed that protects our law enforcement agencies from these as they do their work.

This is on the top of my wish list. We need actionable intelligence on the large alien smuggling organizations with international links that facilitate terrorist crossings into our country. What makes them tick? What goes into the planning and carrying out of operations? What process is used to make operational decisions? Are decisions to transport their cargo based on an analysis of historic trends displayed by law enforcement? Where do they obtain fraudulent papers and passports? How do they obtain real time information about law enforcement border security plans? What are the tactics, techniques and procedures the organizations follow? How do terrorists convince the smugglers to provide safe passage into our country?

To get the answers, we have to get down and dirty. This means infiltration of the groups by informants and by agents (HUMINT operations), and when it’s learned that we’ve been cozy with some very slimy characters this means being prepared to face the inevitable congressional hearings and second guessing. Can we do it? We’ve done it with all stripes of organized crime and hostile intelligence agencies and we can do it again. Is it essential? I’m sure of it.

This General Douglas MacArthur quote serves as a daily reminder for all of us to remain vigilant: “I am concerned for the security of our great nation, not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within.”
__________

• Aliens of Special Interest Countries (ASIC) are those individuals traveling both legally and illegally to the United States and originating in countries with known ties to terrorist groups or with a substantial terrorist presence within their borders.

• The term Special Interest Alien (SIA) covers individuals from Afghanistan, Algeria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Djibouti, Egypt, Eritrea, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Malaysia, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Philippines, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, the United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Yemen, Gaza, and the West Bank.

TAGS: adult counterterrorism books advice counterterrorism books counterterrorism stories independent publishing news publisher reviews

United In Hate by Dr. Jamie Glazov -- a review

United In Hate -- The Left's Romance With Tyranny and Terror is a book that examines the seamy underbelly of the radical Left which considers Western society and its values an anathema. Dr. Jamie Glazov, the Managing Editor of FrontPage Magazine, methodically details the causational factors that have lead modern Leftists to adhere to the death and destruction mantra of tyrannical Islamic Jihadists.

The Twin Towers are destroyed, 2973 people die in the attack and the radical Left cheers; the war in Iraq is won and the Left expels a disgusted sigh; totalitarian thugs kill innocent millions that the Left justifies as a “cleansing” required to forge a utopian society; suicidal Jihadists shred shoppers in malls with nail bombs and are excused by the Left as door-matted victims striking back at their oppressors; women are vilified, stoned, mutilated and killed by radical Muslims as Leftist feminists remain silent, save here in America where they rail mightily against a country club that’s denied membership to a female executive.

What draws Leftists moth-like toward the annihilating fires of unbridled totalitarianism, or drives them to slavishly worship at the feet of dictators that kick them to the curb when they are considered no longer useful? Why does the Left cleave to a radical Islamic terrorism that vows to destroy all non-believers, including them? Dr. Glazov answers these and other “head scratching” questions in a court-ready presentation of the Left’s mindset that will make forensic psychologists proud.

The Left’s hatred and rejection of Western civilization, its freedoms and values, begins with an acute sense of alienation from it, and unable to “fit in” the Left believes radical societal change, regardless of the consequences, is necessary. After all it’s the West’s fault that the Left has no sense of purpose or direction. Although the Left vehemently argues against this premise, its words and actions prove Dr. Glazov’s case.

The ideological descendents of the communist/progressive Left that spent its capital hoping the West would lose the Cold War to the Soviet Union are today’s leftist core. Based on their hatred for the United States, the Left has forged a symbiotic relationship with radical Islam, whose hatred for America equals theirs. Both make it clear that they consider Western civilization evil and unworthy of preservation. Violent revolution is the Left’s path to change; the Jihadists’ follow the path of war and annilation.

Some might think Dr. Glazov has taken a wrong turn in his analysis of the radical Left’s agenda and beliefs. If so, they should read the scurrilous quotes of Michael Moore extolling the virtues of the “Iraqi freedom fighters,” or Ward Churchill’s and Jeremiah Wright’s crowing after 9/11 that “America’s chickens have come home to roost.” Or, they should examine the genuflexing before the world’s tyrants by the likes of Jimmy Carter, Sean Penn and Tom Hayden. Dr. Glazov’s take on the radical Left is correct and as sharp as a tightly focused laser.

Should the book cause even one radical Leftist to re-examine his or her contorted beliefs and return from the “dark side,” Dr. Glazov’s efforts will be a resounding success. A great thought provoking read!

Ben R. Furman
Former FBI Counterterrorism Chief
www.blackhawkpress.com/blog

adult counterterrorism books advicecounterterrorism books counterterrorism stories independent publishing news publisher reviews writing advice

The FATA & Terrorism

By Ben Furman, Former FBI Counterterrorism Chief

In February 2008 Mike McConnell, the Director of US National Intelligence, testified before the House Intelligence Committee and said this, “The FATA (Federally Administered Tribal Areas) of Pakistan serve as a staging area for al Qaeda’s attacks in support of the Taliban in Afghanistan as well as a location for training new terrorist operatives for attacks in Pakistan, the Middle East, Africa, Europe, and the United States.”

Pakistan is a terrorism crossroad and its border provinces provide a safe haven that has allowed al Qaeda to regenerate critical elements of its attack capability, including re-filling key leadership positions.

Geographically, the FATA are bordered by: Afghanistan to the west along the Durand Line, the term for the 1,610 mile border between Afghanistan and Pakistan, the North-West Frontier Province, the Punjab to the east, and Balochistan to the south. The seven tribal areas of Khyber, Kurram, Bajaur, Mohamand, Orakzai, north and south areas of Waziristan form the FATA. They lie in a north to south strip adjacent to the west side of the six frontier regions of Peshawar, Kohat, Tank, Banuu, Lakki and Dera Ismail Khan that also lie north to south. According to CIA figures the total population of the FATA in 2000 was 3,341,070 people, or roughly 2% of Pakistan's population. It is a rural territory with only 3.1% of the population residing in established townships.

The region is nominally controlled by the central government of Pakistan. In reality the Pashtun tribes inhabit the territory, and they are ruled by tribal elders. The tribes are fiercely independent and not overly friendly with Pakistan’s central government, which has done little to root out the terrorist enclaves that are easily located since they operate in the open with impunity.

The central government is shaky and operates in constant fear of a military junta. Pakistan has about 85 nuclear weapons that are under the total control of the Pakistani military, and Pakistan is steadily adding to its nuclear weapon stockpile. For example, China has agreed to build two nuclear power plants in Pakistan. This deal – especially if it does not contain mechanisms to prevent nuclear material from being transferred from the new civilian plants to military facilities – signals a nascent nuclear arms race in Asia. A 2007 poll of 117 nongovernmental terrorism experts found that 74 percent consider Pakistan, not Iran, the country most likely to transfer nuclear technology to terrorists in the next three to five years.

How did Pakistan become a nuclear weapon country? Through the illicit work of a nationalist Islamic scientist, A. Q. Khan, the father of Pakistan’s “Islamic bomb” and the purveyor of sensitive nuclear technology across the Middle East and Asia – to Libya, North Korea and perhaps to other countries. There may be other Pakistani scientists who have been or would be willing to work with other countries or with terrorists to help them acquire nuclear weapons.

So where is this leading? We have tribal areas sympathetic to al Qaeda, and a country with nuclear technology and devices that possibly could be acquired by al Qaeda through its liaisons with Pakistani militants. A recent National Intelligence Estimate said, “al Qaeda will continue trying to acquire and employ chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear material, and it would not hesitate to use them if it develops sufficient capability.”

Pakistan is an ally, but there’s a grave danger it could also be an unwitting source of a terrorist attack on the United States, perhaps by weapons of mass destruction. The Mumbai, India attack by the Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorists (1) with alleged links to elements of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence Agency has raised the tension between the two countries to a tipping point. Pakistan military resources recently directed against terrorist activity in the FATA are being re-deployed along the India/Pakistan border to address a possible attack by India. This is a real possibility since there have been three violent conflicts between the countries since 1947, and a contentious and sometimes violent border dispute over Kashmir continues. Al Qaeda thrives on this kind of volatility and once out of the spotlight it will plot the next attack.

On his list of problems to address our President must put Pakistan and the tribal areas near the top.

- - - - Footnotes - - - -

(1) Lashkar-e-Taiba is a self-described militant Islamic group based in Pakistan and Kashmir. Their stated goal is to end any Indian occupation of Kashmir and to further promote a fundamentalist Islamic government in Pakistan and throughout South Asia.
The Pakistani government stated that senior members of Lashkar-e-Taiba have confessed to being involved in the attacks. And India's Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said on January 6, 2009, that evidence suggested official Pakistani agencies likely supported the terrorist organization in its attack on Mumbai.

TAGS: action adventure adventure series adviceindependent publishing news publisher reviews

The Terrorist Attack on Mumbai, India and the Media

By Ben Furman, former FBI Counterterrorism Chief

Here are my thoughts about the media coverage of the terrorist attack on Mumbai, formerly Bombay, India. The media, as it often does, caused my blood pressure to skyrocket by its soft-pedaling of the identification of the terrorist attackers as Muslims. I guess reporting this fact was something it considered offensive and politically incorrect. But this reporting by omission follows the media’s template of not calling terrorists “terrorists” for fear of creating more terrorists; or, refusing to call our war on terrorism a war by defining it as, “regional conflicts of opposing factions.” Only the media can make sense of this circular reasoning. At least the media is consistent. It does the same with illegal aliens that have invaded our country by calling them undocumented workers; or failing to mention in the descriptions of bank robbers that the perpetrators are black, Mexican, and so on. Rather than helping, this ostrich approach to reporting is divisive. We have to get past the reluctance to discuss things as they are without the socially engineered egg shell-walking.

And what’s up with the media’s apparent lack of interest to delve deeper into the tragic fate of the innocent victims at the Chabad Jewish Center? Was the terrorist targeting of the Center about the State of Israel, or was it just a continuation of the gruesome medieval tradition of anti-Semitism? This answer is worth a line or a couple of words from the media.

Why wasn’t the media “all over” the Muslim organizations that rail with an uncontrolled fanaticism against cartoons of Mohammed that they consider insulting? Shouldn’t there be an explanation why they remained eerily silent about the atrocities in Mumbai?

The Mumbai slaughter should be a wake-up call to all Western liberals who believe that jihadism can be defeated through “I’m okay; you’re okay” happy talk. Many Americans, particularly those who buy into the media’s global vision, seem to have been lulled into a false feeling of security because we haven’t been attacked here since 9/11. But Muslim-based jihadism is a world that continues to pose a serious threat to every open democratic society.

A study of ancient history shows us that great civilizations, from Egypt and Persia to Rome and Byzantium, broke down in stages of superficially interspersed tranquil decades. We’re on the same glide path but we're moving at a greatly accelerated downward rate – the time spans are getting compressed. Because of the unprecedented fragility of our communications systems, our intertwined power grids and complex transportation systems, the technological West is highly vulnerable to sabotage and destruction. We need the media to step up, minus its rose colored glasses, and report the world as is, rather than the way the media wants it to be.

So how long will it take us to drive the final nail into jihadism? If we are ever vigilant and take the fight to the terrorists, it will probably take a hundred years or more. And if we don't defeat the jihadists our world as we know it will end.


adult counterterrorism books adult fiction thriller adult novels adventure series advice counterterrorism stories independent publishing news publisher reviews suspense thrillers writing advice